Should Non-Profit Boards Have Term Limits?

Unequivocally YES. Here is why…

Serving on a non-profit board is a privilege requiring a commitment of time and talent that can easily wane over time without term limits. Lifetime or long-term appointments may inhibit innovation, accountability, and engagement. It may stifle growth and often leads to complacency in holding the CEO accountable. As a best practice, non-profits must have term limits with written expectations for board membership, including well defined expectations regarding meeting attendance and committee participation. Term Limits are POSITIVE, POWERFUL, and NECESSARY for governing a forward moving organization that prioritizes equity in governance. Retired board members can remain engaged without holding a “voting” seat at the decision-making table. New perspectives, diverse lived experiences, innovation, and accountability are central to advancing the mission of any organization. Don’t be afraid of term limits! It will not hinder progress; it will sustain long-term impact and growth.